Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of large-scale systems using gradient-type interaction prediction approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a new decomposition–coordination framework is presented for two-level optimal control of large-scale nonlinear systems. In the proposed approach, decomposition is performed by defining an interaction vector, while coordination is based on a new interaction prediction approach. In the first level, sub-problems are solved for nonlinear dynamics using a gradient method, while in the second level, the coordination is done using the gradient of coordination errors. This is in contrast to the conventional gradient-type coordination schemes, where they use the gradient of Lagrangian function. It is shown that the proposed decomposition–coordination framework considerably reduces the number of iterations. Moreover, compared to the substitution-type coordination approaches which are well known for their fast convergence rates and limited convergence regions, the proposed approach is robust with respect to parameters’ variation in addition to its good convergence rate. The robustness and the convergence rate of the proposed approach in compare to the costate prediction method are shown through simulations of a benchmark problem. The results are also compared to the ones obtained using centralized approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luus R (1990) Optimal control by dynamic programming using systematic reduction in grid size. Int J Control 51: 995–1013

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Vassiliadis VS (1993) Computational solution of dynamic optimization problems with general differential-algebraic constraints. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College, University of London, UK

  3. Bryson AE, Ho YC (1975) Applied optimal control. Hemisphere, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kirk DE (1970) Optimal control theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mesarovic MD, Macko D, Takahara Y (1970) Theory of hierarchical multilevel systems. Academic Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Mesarovic MD, Macko D, Takahara Y (1969) Two coordination principles and their applications in large-scale systems control. In: Proceedings of IFAC congress, Warsaw, Poland

  7. Jamshidi M (1997) Large-scale systems: modeling, control and fuzzy logic. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh MD (1980) Dynamical hierarchical control (revised edn). North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lasdon LS (1970) Optimization theory for large systems. MacMilan, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh MG, Titli A (1978) Systems: decomposition, optimisation and control. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hassan M, Singh MG (1976) Optimization of non-linear systems using a new two-level method. Automatica 12: 359–363

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahmoud SM, Hassan MF, Darwish MG (1985) Large-scale control systems: theories and techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ailing L (2004) A study on the large-scale system decomposition–coordination method used in optimal operation of a hydroelectric system. Water Int 29: 228–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan H (2001) Hierarchical stochastic production planning for the highest business benefit. Robot Comput Integr Manufact 17: 405–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kambhampati C, Perkgoz C, Patton RJ, Ahamed W (2007) An interaction predictive approach to fault-tolerant control in network control systems. Proc I Mech E Part I J Syst Control Eng 221: 885–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zeng-Guang H (2001) A hierarchical optimization neural network for large-scale dynamic systems. Automatica 37: 1931–1940

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Blouin VY, Lassiter JB, Wiecek MM, Fadel GM (2005) Augmented Lagrangian coordination for decomposed design problems. 6th World Congresses of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Rio de Janeiro

  18. Gu JC, Wan BW (2001) Steady state hierarchical optimizing control for large-scale industrial processes with fuzzy parameters. IEEE Trans Syst Cybern C Appl Rev 31: 352–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stoilov T, Stoilova K (2008) Goal and predictive coordination in two level hierarchical systems. Int J General Syst 37: 181–213

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu M, Wang Y, Shao H (2008) Costate prediction based optimal control for non-linear hybrid systems. ISA Trans 47: 113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sadati N (1998) Coordination of large-scale systems with fuzzy interaction prediction principle. Int J Sci Technol 4: 177–182

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hsiao FH, Hwang JD (2001) Stability analysis of fuzzy large-scale systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 32: 122–126

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang WJ, Luoh L (2004) Stability and stabilization of fuzzy large-scale systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 12: 309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang H, Li C, Liao X (2006) Stability analysis and H controller design of fuzzy large-scale systems based on piecewise Lyapunov functions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 36: 685–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sadati N (2005) A Novel approach to coordination of large-scale systems; part I—interaction prediction principle. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on industrial technology, Hong Kong, China, pp 641–647

  26. Sadati N (2005) A Novel approach to coordination of large-scale systems; part II—interaction balance principle. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on industrial technology, Hong Kong, China, pp 648–654

  27. Sadati N, Momeni A (2006) Stochastic control of two-level nonlinear large-scale systems; part I—interaction prediction principle. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, Taipei, Taiwan

  28. Sadati N, Dehghan Marvast E (2006) Stochastic control of two-level nonlinear large-scale systems; part II—interaction balance principle. In: IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, Taipei, Taiwan

  29. Sadati N, Babazadeh A (2006) Optimal control of robot manipulators with a new two-level gradient based approach. J Electr Eng 88: 383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Luenberger DG (1973) Introduction to linear and nonlinear programming. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nasser Sadati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sadati, N., Ramezani, M.H. Optimization of large-scale systems using gradient-type interaction prediction approach. Electr Eng 91, 301–312 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-009-0134-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-009-0134-x

Keywords

Navigation